MiaSueZepp pointed out most of what you should keep in mind, but the thing that bothered me is the dress to the body. The body is nicely detailed and shaded, but the dress just looks like it's been pasted it on with little shading. Though, i do see you tried to put some there. I suggest drawing wrinkles and lines with a darker brush to help surface some detail, shading will be a little easier that way and not so plain. The background, is a nice touch. The sunset and the mountains. But the problem with using a photoshop brush for one thing, is sometimes it's unclear what it's supposed to me. I'm guessing a foresty thing? But at first it looked like a big bush. Nice touch with the shadow. The area with her knee is a little odd. if you look at the one closest to the shadow, right above the knee is a little to thin. Nice work on the fingers and hair. c: Nice job on the lips as well. though they're a little wide; a face is lined up in sections. the end of our lips end around the start or (closely around) of the eyes. then the nose is plopped in the middle. c:
Also one last thing I wanted to point out, there's no dark and light source. it's straight daylight which wouldn't be completely realistic when there's a sunset. It would mean everything is turning darker, and that the girl would probably stand out more by the reflection of the sunset.
Vision: - It's a fairly good piece of art, but it's not something I would fave at first view. The colours are boring and her body shape kind of confuses me, because the body shape on her upper part of the dress looks odd. - Her shoulders are a tiny bit too pointy, like it would be on a man. Women's shoulders are softer looking than men’s. - I also don’t really like how you’ve made the nose. It looks like it’s a bulge coming out of here face and not a nose. I know this a style you have, but if it wasn’t me who were going to give you a critique, you would receive a bad comment on this. - She do though look very lovely and for that I'll give you a 3. Originality: - I have to give you a 2, 5. - It’s not a very original drawing you’ve done. You could have made the dress, the hair or the shoes a little bit detailed with accessories or such. - The background is rather boring and looks like you just ran out of ideas and threw it in the last minute. Technique: - I would like to give you a 4 on this once, but I have to give you a 3. - The reason is because in the background you have used for the forest is just a sloppy Photoshop brush. You could have taken time to actually make a much better background than what you’ve done here. - I do though like the shading on the hair, but I have to take away some points here, because at some part you again have been sloppy. If you look close to her left shoulder and the right shoulder the hair is a bit sharp and almost pixel looking, unlike you’ve done earlier with the hair. - The lips are far by the best thing I can point out. You’ve used a very good technique and I give you 1 point for this. - I also have to point out the difference of the blur and focus in the drawing. She seems so blurry, while the forest is more detailed. This is a minus as well.
Impact: - I have to give you 2,5 on this. - It’s not really a drawing you’ll remember after seen it the first time. - She’s too manly and well, the drawing is just plain.
The area with her knee is a little odd. if you look at the one closest to the shadow, right above the knee is a little to thin. Nice work on the fingers and hair. c: Nice job on the lips as well. though they're a little wide; a face is lined up in sections. the end of our lips end around the start or (closely around) of the eyes. then the nose is plopped in the middle. c:
Also one last thing I wanted to point out, there's no dark and light source. it's straight daylight which wouldn't be completely realistic when there's a sunset. It would mean everything is turning darker, and that the girl would probably stand out more by the reflection of the sunset.
- Her shoulders are a tiny bit too pointy, like it would be on a man. Women's shoulders are softer looking than men’s.
- I also don’t really like how you’ve made the nose. It looks like it’s a bulge coming out of here face and not a nose. I know this a style you have, but if it wasn’t me who were going to give you a critique, you would receive a bad comment on this.
- She do though look very lovely and for that I'll give you a 3.
Originality: - I have to give you a 2, 5.
- It’s not a very original drawing you’ve done. You could have made the dress, the hair or the shoes a little bit detailed with accessories or such.
- The background is rather boring and looks like you just ran out of ideas and threw it in the last minute.
Technique: - I would like to give you a 4 on this once, but I have to give you a 3.
- The reason is because in the background you have used for the forest is just a sloppy Photoshop brush. You could have taken time to actually make a much better background than what you’ve done here.
- I do though like the shading on the hair, but I have to take away some points here, because at some part you again have been sloppy. If you look close to her left shoulder and the right shoulder the hair is a bit sharp and almost pixel looking, unlike you’ve done earlier with the hair.
- The lips are far by the best thing I can point out. You’ve used a very good technique and I give you 1 point for this.
- I also have to point out the difference of the blur and focus in the drawing. She seems so blurry, while the forest is more detailed. This is a minus as well.
Impact:
- I have to give you 2,5 on this.
- It’s not really a drawing you’ll remember after seen it the first time.
- She’s too manly and well, the drawing is just plain.
The Artist has requested Critique on this Artwork
Please sign up or login to post a critique.